widget sells electronic gadgets. widget entered into a contract with dodgy, &the contract is fully enforcable. dodgy told widget there is a new product called divdo & is manufactured in taiwan. The Divdo is a new interactive game console & was given to widget to test. the staff loved it and they ordered 50,000 units from dodgy at .00 each. widget accepted delivery of the 50,000 units however while stocking the shelves they removed the divdo label & there was a "Mii" label underneath, & manufactured in china.there were a mixture of products in the boxes. There were some Miii’s, old Atari game systems & an assortment of old computers. Widget employees are now going through the entire shipment to determine what they have received from Dodgy.Of the .75 million purchase price, Widget has paid million. widget cant contact dodgy and is seeking legal advice on Litigation process; appropriate court to initiate proceedings; relevant law, (contract law) & victorian court rules.
this is in relation to australian law
contract law essay question HELP!! 10 points best answer?
Posted by admin on Tuesday, September 15th 2009
15
Sep
Sep
2 Comments Already
miss schlonky Said,
September 15th, 2009 @9:09 am
I think you need the 10 points more than I do. Hit the books, jacko! Good luck
Related Post
- How to deal with China suppliers #2 (March 9th, 2010)
- The Lawbringer: Euro-ver my head, contract law edition (March 9th, 2010)
- Taking Your Product From Conception To Market. China Manufacturing … (March 7th, 2010)
- Jim O'Neill's Weekend Just Got Really Bad, As China Prepares To … (March 7th, 2010)
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement by Robert Hall? (March 6th, 2010)
Please Leave Your Comments Below
- What kinds of laws prevented child labor in China, and what are the names of the laws and what did they do?
- Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags in USA?
- China Law & Policy » Academic Misconduct in China – “What's Law …
- JURIST – Paper Chase: China legislature weighs election reform …
- Laws Questions & Answers | anti aging
- Canada Now Somewhat Less Anti-Startup
- China, India like US Patent Reform — Mises Economics Blog
- Patent Reform is a Patent Giveaway | The Jacksonville Observer
- Labor On Dems Who Block Health Reform: We'll 'Take Them Out'
- International Economic Law and Policy Blog: The Great Trade Debate …
- faring in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- away in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- Original Commun… in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- Kelle in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- Scott in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- Kazawa Ao in What kinds of laws prevented child …
- Daisymae †SFE… in Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags …
- patty* in Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags …
- corgigirl in Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags …
- taters in Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags …
Search
Categories
-
- Administrative law (191)
- Company law (320)
- Contract law (247)
- Food law (150)
- Labor law (263)
- Monopoly law (144)
- Other Infomations (100)
- Other Laws (133)
- Patent Law (245)
- Tax law (288)
- World News (25)
Blogroll
Monthly Review
-
- March 2010 (75)
- February 2010 (220)
- January 2010 (225)
- December 2009 (254)
- November 2009 (298)
- October 2009 (393)
- September 2009 (641)
Daily Posts
Browse Our Tag Archives
appid article business china chinese congress context contract law countries country detected domestic energy european government india international internet invalid labor law legal missing national obama office pakistan patent law people power president president-obama republic russia school source state steve-dickinson swedish tax law time trade united united-states university world
Recommended Money Makers
Top Commentators
- You must download top commentator plugin for this section to work
Most Popular
- you must install the popular plugin by alex king for this section to work
Recent Updated Post
- What kinds of laws prevented child labor in China, and what are the names of the laws and what did they do?
- Complete Phase Out of Plastic Bags in USA?
- China Law & Policy » Academic Misconduct in China – “What's Law ...
- JURIST - Paper Chase: China legislature weighs election reform ...
- Laws Questions & Answers | anti aging
- Canada Now Somewhat Less Anti-Startup
- China, India like US Patent Reform — Mises Economics Blog
- Patent Reform is a Patent Giveaway | The Jacksonville Observer
- Labor On Dems Who Block Health Reform: We'll 'Take Them Out'
- International Economic Law and Policy Blog: The Great Trade Debate ...
©2010 China Law | China's Law
Disclaimer: All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
If this is US law, this is a sales issue and is governed by the UCC. Widget should contact Dodgy and ask them to cure the error in delivery if it is an error. Unfortunately, the question says this isn’t possible. The units shipped are non-conforming goods and these goods have been discovered in the course of Widget’s inspection of the goods. Widget is not required to accept the goods. Unfortunately Widget has already paid for a portion of the goods.
If Widget is unsuccessful in making contact with Dodgy, it should bring suit. If Widget and Dodgy are in the same State the action should be brought in State Court in the appropriate division for the amount in contraversy. If Widget and Dodgy are in different states the action may be brought in Federal court as the amount in contraversy exceeds $75,000 and the parties have diversity.
Relevant law – Uniform Commercial Code and Common law Contracts
Victorian Court Rules – No clue as to this one sorry.